Our lab is interested in how
proteins are manufactured and targeted to their specific
locations as well as in the growing field of membrane protein
structure and biology. The strategy that we use is based largely
on X-ray crystallography. We currently study evolutionally
conserved pathways in prokaryotes with the eventual goal of
expanding into eukaryotic membrane proteins. There are four
major projects in the lab.
Sec Dependent Protein
Translocation
In all kingdoms, many nascent secretory and membrane proteins
are co-translationally targeted to membranes by cleavable signal
sequences and transmembrane (TM) segments with the aid of the
signal recognition particle (SRP). At the membrane, the
polypeptide is translocated across or integrated laterally by
the protein-conducting channel the SecY complex. We have
recently determined the structure of the SecY channel complex
from the archaebacteria Methanococcus jannaschii. The X-ray
structure demonstrated how the channel can translocate many
different kinds of protein chains that differ in size and
chemical nature, how the channel maintains the membrane barrier,
and how membrane proteins can exit an aqueous pore and enter the
lipid bilayer. One of the most interesting results is that the
structure changed the dogma that a pore is formed by multiple
SecY complexes showing that a single complex forms the
translocation pore. Subsequently this model has been supported
by direct biochemical evidence [1,2]. Electron microscopy (EM)
had shown that the SecY complex assembles into multimers when
bound to the ribosome [3-5]. In light of the recent data, one
can now ask why multimers are required for translocation and how
the different SecY complexes interact with the ribosome. To
answer this question requires high resolution structures of
ribosome-channel complexes and we are collaborating with the lab
of Dr. Tom Rapoport at Harvard Medical School to obtain
structural information.
Tat Dependent Protein
Translocation
In many prokaryotes, another protein translocation system is
present in the cytoplasmic membrane. It is called the twin-arginine
translocation (Tat) complex, and it operates in a functionally
distinct pathway from Sec-dependent translocation (reviewed in
[6,7]). The Tat complex is homologous to the _pH-dependent
pathway found in the thylakoid membrane of higher plant
chloroplasts. Unlike the SecY complex, which translocates
unstructured substrates, the Tat complex specifically transports
folded proteins, such as those containing metal co-factors. The
N-terminal signal sequences of the Tat pathway are longer than
conventional signal sequences and contain the conserved motif
SRRxFLK.
There are three major components
in the Tat sytem, TatA, TatB and TatC. All are integral membrane
proteins with TatA and TatB containing a single-membrane
spanning N-terminal helix and an amphipathic cytoplasmic
C-terminal helix, while TatC contains six transmembrane helices
and both termini in the cytoplasm. TatA and TatB have an
approximate 20% sequence identity, yet are functionally
different. TatA is expressed in more than 20 fold excess over
TatB and TatC [8].
Although Tat substrates are
small, transport of the folded substrates requires that the
channel form pores up to 70Å in diameter. A simple analysis of
the required dimensions leads to a pore lined by at least 20
transmembrane helices [6]. Two large complexes have been
purified from overexpressed Tat components. The first contains
TatB and TatC in a 1:1 ratio with a small amount of TatA, at a
molecular weight by gel filtration of approximately 600 kDa
indicating a multi-copy complex [9,10]. TatB and TatC are
required for signal sequence recognition, and this complex has
been shown to bind to signal peptide [10]. The second complex
consists predominantly of TatA with small amounts of TatB and
TatC [10]. Visualized by negative stain EM, the TatA complex
appears as large rings with an apparent central pore of ~65Å,
similar to the predicted channel size [11]. This, with much
other evidence, leads to the conclusion that a pore is formed by
multiple copies of TatA and signal peptide recognition is by
TatB and TatC.
The Tat translocation field is
relatively young, and many simple questions remain unanswered
about this intrinsically interesting system. Our goals are to
understand the function of the Tat system through the use of
structural biology. This system is a potential antimicrobial
target and has biotechnological applications in protein
expression.
Membrane Proteins Involved in
Glycosylation
In eukaryotes, an essential part of the export and maturation of
many proteins that enter the ER lumen is that they contain
specific glycosylation sites for the attachment of N-linked
oligosaccharide chains. The first enzyme in this process is a
multisubunit enzyme complex termed the oligosaccharyltransferase
(OST). The enzyme is part of the larger translocon complex that
contains SecY and recognizes the consensus sequence N-X-T/S as
nascent proteins are translocated. Recently, a bacterial
homologue has been identified in the species Campylobacter
jejuni [12] which has been shown to functionally glycosylate
substrates in E. coli. This and related archael homologues are
perfect candidates for structural studies.
Cellulose synthase and
Eukaryotic Membrane Proteins
A major component of plant tissue is cellulose, a
&Mac178;-1,4-glucan chain, which is a major component of the
biomass of the earth and the major component of many products
(i.e. paper). It is synthesized by a family of proteins termed
cellulose synthases (CesA) (reviewed in [13,14]). These are
large integral membrane proteins, over 1000 amino acids long,
containing eight TM helices and a large cytoplasmic globular
domain between the second and third TM helices. The most
interesting fact about these proteins is that the catalytic
activity is at the center of the TM domain, with glucose
entering from the cytoplasmic side and cellulose exiting the
opposite side. Additionally, the active site must somehow
alternate relative to the growing chain to add each incoming
sugar in a different orientation from the last. Many plants
contain multiple genes in the CesA family that vary in size, but
all CesA genes contain the same general features and have high
sequence similarity. Solving the structure of the CesA proteins
will provide a means for exploring expression systems for
eukaryotic membrane proteins and is a long term goal of the
laboratory.